🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an event that began as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are remunerated to address predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in winter, but also in autumn in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The period has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the celebration is commemorated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it progresses is a valuable example in how co-option leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels emboldened to say that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, far-right parties are surging in Europe as a whole.

In the US, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A drive to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the records is ongoing. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be effective if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered commemorations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the contemporary world. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a educator at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden efforts for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an foundation that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the history when it fails to address the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Organizations who observe it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that affect everyone if anti-racism is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and adaptive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.